So really what this means is that no mater what the law says the jury will pretty much have the right to choose weather the person is going to be guilty or innocent and that is kind of ok in some cases but then again its not in others so we should not expect our juries to judge our laws only the case that person is being tried in and they should only judge that person on all of the facts given. Amendment VI This is the sixth amendment and this tells you about what juries can do in cases of law. Everyone get the rights to a speedy trial and an impartial jury. Those Patriots intended the jury serve as one of the tests a law must pass before it assumes enough popular authority to be enforced.
Hire Writer Anywhere in the world a jury just like a judge can nullify a criminal case. For example OJ Simpsons case proved that he was guilty but since the Rodney King incident occurred prior too, he was nullified by the jury.
Often times it is not supported because it allows a biased judgment to be formed not based on guilt of the person but based on race. Majority of the times setting criminals free to commit the same crimes again.
Being acquitted of all charges is usually how jury nullifications occur. Many believe that racial nullification should be possible for those that have committed non-violent crimes even if the evidence shows that the person is in fact guilty. The contribution to the criminal justice system is that this would allow the prison system to have more space for those that commit more violent crimes regardless of their race.
As we see jury nullification can either be beneficial or it can truly destroy the criminal justice system. Courtrooms need to recognize that there needs to be no biases within the system or people need to be blindfolded before being a part of a case.
There needs to be a model set forth in regards to the influence that justice should outweigh any feelings in regards to race and one should serve time for the crime that they was convicted of.
African American, or Hispanic or minorities races apply society ought to come close to their effort and be aware of its supporting nature and their choice to practice their authority in benefit of their area.
In all these cases, the juror should be educated through his or her viewpoint of what is just and unjust. An opinion paper mentioned that all Black Americans should partake in race- based jury nullification and that to do so would bring about changes in how the justice system handled minority cases, Jemal, Other valid points are made by Jemel, supporting his belief in race-based jury nullification by stating The system is designed to put blacks in jail for largely economic crimes while letting child molesters, rapist and murderers go free After doing all the necessary research, I stand to say that I am against race based nullification.
As stated the juror knows what the defendant has done and yet still allows him or her to be acquitted of the crimes because they feel bad for them or the most used their race.
These are biased reasons that should not be used when a person is involved with a criminal case.
Race nullification either helps or hinders the system and we are always fighting for a better system. The jury is also sworn into the court by swearing on a Bible that they will not only take into consideration the evidence presented by both parties and that they will not allow for any personal feelings or personal bias to get in the way of their vote.
Upon reading this paper it provide detailed information about the influence that ethnicity had on courtroom proceeds and judicial practices, the arguments that were for and against race based nullification with contemporary examples. Where I stand on this subject is evident based on my response and I am a firm believer in equality for all.
Racism comes in all forms as we can see. How to cite this page Choose cite format:Jury Nullification Paper Sherita Burress CJA/ September 12, Gerry Lloyd A situation that gives the jury a judgment of nonguilty is known as jury nullification. Jury Nullification Essay - Jury nullification is when a jury acquits a defendant who it believes is guilty of the crime he is charged (Hickey, p.
). This is because the jury chose to ignore the facts of the case and the judge instructions, and based his or her decision on personal opinion. Jury Nullification Paper Essay Sample. In our society, ethnicity does have major effects on our judicial practices and courtroom proceedings do to The Sentencing Project research.
What is Jury Nullification? Julian Heicklen (right) An Essay on The Trial by Jury, by Lysander Spooner The clearest defense of the trial by jury and jury nullification.
Spooner’s essay attacks the Fugitive Slave Act while asserting the right of the jury to nullify the law. Jury nullification is defined as when juries believe a case is unjust or wrong and may set free a defendant who violated the law.
Jury nullification has been an option of a jury in the United States. LearningTeam Assignment: Jury Nullification Paper. September 21, addams. Disclaimer: All works delivered by Essay Writing Company such as: essays, research papers, thesis papers, dissertations, term papers should be used as samples aimed for assistance purposes only.